Below is a chart (credit RPX) showing the marketshare growth of the trolls. This only happens when a business, no matter how nefarious is profitable. In fact, per the PWC report cited below, the annual median damage award was $5.3mm. It's significant that when these cases are heard by juries, the rewards to non-practicing entities tend to be many multiples of those awarded by judges. Therefore, there is a peverse incentive for NPE's to not settle, but to push an average of 2.5 years, for a jury trial. Based on performance, the odds are stacked against the defendants
*non- PAE are non practicing entities, usually corporate shells whose only assets are patents
The present administration is trying to help with the reintroduction of the SHIELD Act and hearings are being held by the House Judiciary committee on the topic. The key provision in the Act is for losers in these suits to bear the costs of both parties, akin to the British system of torts. I am not sure this is a good solution as it always favors the 'deep pockets', but something has to be done.
For more information, here's an excellent PWC report on the topic from 2012.
I applaud the efforts of one of our industry associations, the SIIA (links to their relevant activities) to help. It would be great if they were joined by the NVCA and others too.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.